Format: Print Length
Publisher: Penn State University Press (October 1, 1990)
Format: PDF / Kindle / ePub
Size: 5.9 MB
Downloadable formats: PDF
an exceptional pragmatist's constitutional thought is inseparable from the felony disputes out of which it arises. John Paul Stevens's concept, that of figuring out person instances good rather than utilising constitutional ideas within the summary to situations through class, therefore lends itself to being studied in its typical, actual habitat—in his personal phrases, case via case. that is what this e-book does. In bankruptcy 1 Sickels distills Stevens's options approximately legislations and appellate judging from his early writings and his reviews at the federal appeals court docket and, from 1975 to the current, at the U.S. ultimate courtroom. Stevens exhibits a priority for evidence and results, for balancing, for deference to different choice makers until they've been careless, for avoidance of undue complexity in judge-made legislations, and for drawing the road among readability and oversimplification in criminal principles. the following 3 chapters describe the appliance of Stevens's pragmatism to parts of constitutional legislations to which the courtroom and he specially have committed such a lot cognizance in recent times: First modification promises of freedom of expression and faith, the procedural promises (broadly, due approach) of the invoice of Rights and the Fourteenth modification, and the equivalent defense of the legislation. In every one sector, Stevens's designated contributions are defined. The concluding bankruptcy areas Stevens's judging within the contexts of the continued debate concerning the legitimacy of balancing, the methods of alternative moderates at the court docket, and the balloting documents of the opposite participants of the court docket as a whole.Unique to this paintings is a significant creation to the time period reasonable whilst utilized to a preferrred courtroom justice, a definition in response to cautious research of the interaction of common principles and particular, case-by-case context. As such it's the very essence of Stevens's personal method of judging and therefore permits research of the paintings of a pragmatist on his personal phrases instead of in the course of the distortions of a conflicting conception of legislations. John Paul Stevens is famous as a jurist of bizarre skill and one adheres to no ideological camp. whereas it really is something to grasp he's neither inflexible liberal nor a conservative, this e-book is going past the "neither nor" to complete the tougher aim of defining what he is.This research is meant for students and scholars of the preferrred courtroom, the structure, the courts, and the yank political method. attorneys operating earlier than the splendid courtroom, knowledgeable generalists, and courtwatchers normally, no matter if liberal, conservative, or impartial, will locate a lot of curiosity right here.